 |
| A purebred sphynx cat. |
UPDATE: The Centre for Veterinary Education recorded this and has made it available online! You can watch the panel discussion here.
Do we breed
companion animals ethically? The answer depends substantially on what you mean.
It was the subject of the annual Robert Dixon Memorial Symposium yesterday
and gee it opened several cans of worms (not literally, that would have been disgusting and raised some welfare concerns in itself).
The panel
consisted of Dr Linda Beer (vet and dog breeder), Dr Andrew Cornwell (NSW MP,
Chair of the NSW Companion Animal Taskforce), Ms Maryann Dalton (Pet Industry
Association of Australia executive officer), Dr Karen Hedberg (vet, breeder,
judge and Chair of the Canine Health and Wellbeing Committee), Bidda Jones
(RSPCA Australia Chief Scientist), Professor Richard Malik (small animal
specialist from the Centre for Veterinary Education) and Professor Claire Wade (geneticist).
I took down
around twelve pages of notes during the session but that is far too long for a
blog post, so I am going to attempt to summarise the key points here. I should
say at the outset that in doing so it is possible that I fail to convey the
exact meaning of the speakers so do read this cautiously, but here goes…
Question 1:
to what extent are breeders and vets responsible for the health and welfare of
companion animals?
Some
panellists felt that vets had a role in educating owners, while, as Dr Jones
said, “We know an awful lot about some of the problems that exist in companion
animal breeding but we’re not doing enough about it.”
Ms Dalton
suggested that everyone is responsible, breeders need to breed sound animals
and vets should pick up health problems as they present, but backyard breeders
who don’t bother visiting vets (and don’t register as breeders or get involved
with professional organisations) slip through the net.
Dr Beer
suggested that some young veterinarians had negative attitudes about breeders,
and were happy to say things about them to colleagues without necessarily
confronting breeders, or, instead, make harsh demands on breeders.
“Unfortunately the veterinary
profession is pushing [breeders] away and not bringing them in and that is a
failing,” she said. Instead, veterinarians should be comfortable working with
breeders, making positive suggestions.
Dr Hedberg
added that registered breeders would produce less than 20% of the puppies in
Australia, and therefore should not be saddled with sole responsibility for
companion animal overpopulation.
In her view,
owners need to do their homework when purchasing an animal – is it suitable for
their back yard? Has it been socialised? Can you meet the parents?
 |
| Cute puppies, but have you met their father? |
“There is a
lot of information that people fail to get when they buy a dog these days,” she
said.
Dr Cornwell
discussed recent NSW State Government changes currently going through
parliament, including $800K funding for school education programs.
Dr Jones
suggested that in the same way we need to be ethical consumers of meat, eggs
and other foods, we need to be ethical “consumers” of companion animals.
“You need to
find out where these animals come from because if you don’t you’re just
perpetuating the problem.”
Resources
such as the RSPCA’s Smart Puppy Buyer’s Guide can be helpful.
Professor
Wade made the insightful point that while breeder registration is an excellent
idea, a large number of people responsible for companion animal overpopulation
would “never consider themselves a breeder so they would never register.”
Question 2.
How can the numbers of companion animals bred annually in Australia be
justified?
Well, one
answer was “they can’t be”. Dr Hedberg cited difficulty in controlling
unregistered breeders selling animals to people who don’t do their homework.
“People need
to get off their butts, see the parents and see the conditions they are raised
in,” she said.
The bad news
is that if the conditions are horrible, people “pity buy” – relieving that
animal of its awful predicament and giving the breeder more money and more
incentive to do it all again [I have been guilty of this previously; once with a guinea pig and once with a cockatiel].
Dr Jones
said she was constantly amazed that so many people don’t understand that entire
animals reproduce. The RSPCA has been actively promoting the early desexing of
animals (before they reach sexual maturity) to reduce the likelihood of
breeding. Other positive steps include the registration of companion animal
breeders, compulsory microchipping and the inclusion of breeder data on the
microchip database so an animal can be traced back to the source.
Many of
these suggestions will be implemented in New South Wales legislation shortly,
Dr Cornwell said – with one warning: “We need to be careful that we don’t
demonise pet ownership. If you over-regulate you will reduce pet ownership
opportunities. Pet ownership is good for you, it is something that should be
encouraged.”
Dr Beer
pointed out that it was impossible to justify numbers of animals bred without
knowing what these numbers are. But she also raised a controversial point: “In
some parts of the world desexing is considered something you do in a bitch with
pyo and at no other time.”
Question 3:
Is some loss of young companion animals inevitable because we can’t expect them
all to fit in behaviourally?
The answer,
unfortunately, was almost resoundingly yes. Unrealistic owner expectations were
identified as a big part of the problem. Dr Beer said prospective owners would
often base their choice of a pet on appearance without factoring in temperament and normal "dog stuff".
 |
| You might love the look of this Border collie...but can you give him enough exercise and stimulation? |
“There will
always be loss when there are incorrect expectations of what the behaviour of a
dog is…the do chew on things…they do poo on the carpet.”
Dr Hedberg
added that many dogs in pounds had ended up there because they were simply
bored to death. Owners would not or could not provide an appropriate
environment. “They’re not being occupied, not being kept busy…a lot of these
dogs don’t suit small backyards,” she said.
The subject
of dog bites was raised and I was heartened to hear that Dr Cornwell’s message
that he takes into government is that five things contribute to dog bites:
- Failure of early socialisation
- Genetics
- Failure of later socialisation
- Medication conditions
- Victim behaviour
Anyone can
affect the way a dog might behave towards an individual, and can end in an
animal being destroyed unnecessarily or avoidably because of something that
ultimately we have done.
Question 4:
whose job is it to ensure that companion animals are bred fit for purpose?
There was
detailed discussion around this point. Dr Beer, a breeder herself, used some
examples to demonstrate that breeder and owner intended purposes could be very
different.
Dr Cornwell
suggested that pet purchase is “buyer beware: you have to make sure you
purchase an animal that is fit to your
purpose…then ensure you undertake appropriate socialisation of that animal.”
Dr Jones
raised the issue of breed standards – a set of arbitrary rules that had nothing
to do with aspects that buyers were looking for – i.e. does it bark? Does it
shed? How does it fit into their life?
“The
standards are mostly about appearance,” she said. “They make it very difficult
for people to breed for temperament.”
Of course
with all decisions we need to understand the way they are made. And we don't always like to question our own motives.
Professor
Malik pointed out that pet ownership is an emotional decision, not a rational
decision. “It’s a bit like buying a car,” he said.
That is, you know you should
see a mechanic first, and follow her advice if she tells you that this isn’t
the car for you. But in truth, if your heart is set on the car, the sound
advice from your mechanic may not alter your decision at all.
As a cat vet
he said he had come to advocate for adoption of moggies over purebreds. No
matter how detailed and sound the advice, potential owners are often refractory
“because they love a Burmese”.
The discussion
ended there, although it could have easily continued for some hours. Due to
time constraints many issues around ethical breeding could not be addressed.
SAT is interested in hearing your views about the scope of the problem and
potential solutions.
